A strong dictatorship is better than
Is democracy better than a dictatorship democracy is better than dictatorship who said democracy is better than a strong dictatorship for the first time. There is more than one form of dictatorship autocracy is an absolute monarchy, in which the power is given to one single person to govern over a group of people an oligarchy is members of a ruling class, in which power is. First, history indicates that the combination of political, civil and economic freedom is a better guarantee of ever-increasing prosperity than a capitalist dictatorship. Why democracy is better than monarchy is democracy better than a monarchy or better than a dictatorship or a very strong junta/oligarchy of a very few people communism has resulted in . This house would rather have a strong dictatorship than a weak democracy pros of having a dictatorship include: no elections, imagine not having to deal with all the political rhetoric, you already have your leader for life.
According to me, strong dictatorship is better than the fragile democracy, as people do not survive under rule of law or end with squabbles and arguments being in fragile democracy will not create any issue as it can be weaken or broken anytime. This house believes that a strong dictatorship is not better than a weak democracy dictatorship is a form of government in which there is a centralization of power while democracy offers freedom to the people for self-expression and libertythe absolute power of a dictatorship, as history has shown us, will result in eventual abuse and . Which is better :monarchy or dictatorship seems like monarchs work better than dictatorships a combination of strong/ruthless personal characteristics and .
Transcript of is dictatorship better than democracy is dictatorship better than democracy guiding question: to what extent is 'dictatorship' a better form of government than democracy which way of government is better democracy a form of government, which is -citizens lost the freedom of . Is a strong dictatorship better than a weak democracy discussion in ' strategic & foreign affairs ' started by visionhawk , dec 30, 2006 page 2 of 3 . A strong, benevolent dictator is far better than a weak democracy however, from the immense and honestly, pretty endless list, of horrific dictators it is apparent that human beings do not have the personal strength and maturity to hand a position of absolute power. We can show in this argument that, being developing nations, china did much better than india, by staying as a one party dictatorship, rather than establishing a multi-party democracy and then that, as a centrally planned economy with a one-party dictatorship in crisis, china was better off than the (now extinct) soviet union, and its . Debate about strong dictatorship is better than a weak democracy: yes, i agree because or no, i disagree because.
Dictatorship is a rule by a dictator or monarch though democracy is widely popular all around the world, i will give you seven reasons why dictatorship is better than democracy top 7 reason why dictatorship is better than democracy :. Yes in democratic countries like the united states, the people have a say in countries ruled by a dictator, the government has the say democracy is better than dictatorship. Essay on dictatorship vs democracy one bad general, said napoleon is better than two good ones in a multitude of minds, much unprofitable discussion takes . Dictator is a ruler who ruled the country in authoritarian / tyrannical and oppressive people and in indonesia there is a real example of dictatorship. Pakistan peoples party chairperson bilawal bhutto zardari has said that a weak democracy is still better than a dictatorship he was talking to the press at the shrine of lal shahbaz qalandar in .
A strong dictatorship is better than
Best answer: no way democracy even if weak gives people choices and freedokm a strong dictatorship removes freedom and often evolves into a paternalistic nanny . The escapist portal the escapist forums off-topic discussion is a humanitarian dictator better than a weak democratic leader in a dictatorship, if the people are not afraid of their . Leadership vs dictatorship – a fine line between the two every panchayat & ward leader have exhibited strong tendency of being dictators finally the line .
A strong dictatorship (not necessarily a tyrannical one, though) is better because a small group of people are making the decisions, and so the decisions are made faster cunning linguist 1 decade ago. Addressing a news conference at bilawal house here on friday, he said that a weak democracy is better than dictatorship he alleged that the pakistan muslim league-nawaz (pml-n) and the pakistan . Even if the dictator was a benevolent one, like a strict, yet loving grandfather, it still would not be better than a democracy we the people is the best form of government, because it always has the potential for strength if the citizens use their minds to participate for positive leadership.
Its not whether a dictatorship is better than a real democracy in pakistan the point is that 'real' democracy has provided results in other countries, so it can do the same in pakistan. After living a while in the free, liberal, and socialist india i am propelled to think how a strong dictatorship can be batter than a weak democracy. A dictatorship is a form of government where the majority, if not all of the power is granted to one individual the people being governed have no say in the way they are governed, and are unable to make any changes to the political system. No dictatorship results from failed democracy and blind faith in a leader a democracy is better than a dictatorship, but a republic is better yet aizen 6 years ago.